Studio 1

290COM  tutorial 1

Case 1

Q1. Personal data shall be processed fairly and lawfully because in this case the user was incorrectly mistaken for a wrong person, and potentially messing up his life.

Q2. Yes the case is against the data protection act , as the information of a convicted man has been used for another , potentially ruining James Wiggins career in the future.

Case 2

Q1. Personal data shall be accurate and up-to-date ,  because the handling of data must always be accurate and up to date as , problems can happen , in jobs , whilst applying for jobs ,in this the case the failure to do so could hit the police hard

Q2.this case is against the dpa as the records of criminals were not handle properly and are containing mistakes .

Case 3

Q1. Personal data shall be obtained only for one or more specified and lawful purposes, and shall not be further processed in any manner incompatible with that purpose or those purposes. Because data should be processed for a specific reason and shouldn’t be passed on for another purpose not concerning the person who the information regards.

Q2. No as there are option that most companies give for example you can tick a box if you do not want your information passed on to third party companies .

Case 4

Q1. Personal data shall be obtained only for one or more specified and lawful purposes, and shall not be further processed in any manner incompatible with that purpose or those purposes. In this case anyone can access the information which lead to the tragic death of jill dando.

Q2. This is against the Data Protection as personal information shouldn’t be allowed to viewed by other people without the person, in the case of  jill dando it’s a sad case as only authorized people should be able to view this content.